In The Process Of Implementation

hanif5669

However a sophisticated attacker can generate many phishing emails and then select only those that have the best chance of success. They take the time to send out these emails and only send them to the people within the company who they believe have the best success rate. This is a much more subtle attack vector that can bypass the layered security approach. Feedback or lack of feedback Also with a small number of phishing emails the attacker can determine what works and what doesn't and then use that feedback to send even better malicious emails.

This process can be repeated until the attacker is caught allowing them to keep improving the phishing emails they send to a specific victim. In this process feedback is of paramount importance. Attackers view feedback as active information but they also view missing feedback as whatsapp mobile number list feedback itself. Missing feedback is important to malicious actors and can sometimes even be their most valuable piece of information. Because they receive no feedback they know an attack has been stopped and can adjust their tactics accordingly.



With patience it's only a matter of time before they can find tactics that work. indirect feedback In addition to feedback and missing feedback there are also indirect feedbacks that are rather harmless such as B. a mouse click on a link in the e-mail. The recipient might have been suspicious scrolled over the link to see where it would lead and then decided it was a malicious link and didn't click it. This is valuable indirect feedback. In this way the attacker knows that the victim's team members are looking for malicious URLs.